McQuaid justifies Contador CAS appeal delay

UCI president Pat McQuaid

UCI president Pat McQuaid (Image credit: Gerry McManus)

Pat McQuaid has justified the UCI’s late decision to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against the dismissal of doping charges against Alberto Contador, claiming that the UCI legal team was stretched to even make the final deadline of March 24.

Contador was cleared of doping by the Spanish Cycling Federation (RFEC) on February 15. The UCI received the official case dossier a few days later and had 30 days to decide on an appeal.

“It’s very simple: the UCI is an international federation that has somewhat limited internal resources in the legal and anti-doping departments. We recieved the dossier on February 24. At that time our main lawyers were heavily involved in the Pellizotti and Cauchioli cases. As soon as that was out of the way, which was in the first couple days of the 30 day period, we started into the file.” McQuaid told Cyclingnews at the track world championships in Apeldoorn.

“Some of it came in Spanish and had to be translated. I can tell you our chief lawyer worked solidly including evenings and two weekends to reach the 24th of March, and he was at his limit to do so. It's a difficult, complex case and it took us time to do it. We were stretched to reach the deadline.”

Contador has confirmed he will ride the Giro d’Italia in May and may also ride the Tour de France in July. After being found not guilty by the Spanish Cycling Federation he is free to race until any final verdict. However, he could lose any results he achieves if he is found guilty of doping by CAS.

Tour de France general director Christian Prudhomme has called for a final verdict from CAS before the start of the Tour de France on July 2. McQuaid admitted that it is unlikely that a verdict will be reached before the Giro d’Italia but hopes the case can be resolved before the start of the Tour de France.

“In complex legal cases like this, these aren't things you can do overnight. I don't see how it's feasible to do so in the time frame before the Giro, but I do see that it could be feasible to do so in the time before the Tour.”

“I haven't studied the arguments on both sides, and I don't know what are the elements in the appeal we will be preparing, or what are the elements in the defence Contador's team will be preparing, or how long it will take. That has to go to the CAS arbitrators before the hearing, so it all takes time.”

Thank you for reading 5 articles in the past 30 days*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read any 5 articles for free in each 30-day period, this automatically resets

After your trial you will be billed £4.99 $7.99 €5.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just £49 $79 €59

Join now for unlimited access

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Laura Weislo
Managing Editor

Laura Weislo has been with Cyclingnews since 2006 after making a switch from a career in science. As Managing Editor, she coordinates coverage for North American events and global news. As former elite-level road racer who dabbled in cyclo-cross and track, Laura has a passion for all three disciplines. When not working she likes to go camping and explore lesser traveled roads, paths and gravel tracks. Laura's specialises in covering doping, anti-doping, UCI governance and performing data analysis.