Sprints underrated, mountains overrated? We just had a huge debate about which Tour de France stages are more exciting, and want to know your thoughts
The start of the Tour has sparked discussion about excitement, tension and whether mountain stages are more foregone than sprints these days
Here at Cyclingnews, we love cycling, obviously. We love talking about it, but mainly, we also love arguing about it, debating tiny things, dissecting the details of the sport.
This morning, spurred on by this year's Tour de France's first sprint stage on stage 5, we were having a quick discussion about whether we like these flat, sprint-guaranteed stages or not. They're becoming less common in the Tour, as the organisers opt for punchier and more challenging courses more frequently, and the days of seven or eight flat days are over.
Most of us agreed that we like sprint stages and the frenetic, if short, period of excitement they bring. Our senior tech writer, Will Jones, agreed too, but then took the debate even further, suggesting that the sprint days can be more exciting than mountain stages these days, given the dominance we often see on those stages, whereas sprints are naturally more open. But then he said something that really got the debate going.
"When was the last time a mountain stage was genuinely exciting?" Will chimed in. Cue the outrage.
"You're not baiting me with this," I replied, despite then immediately rising to the bait and what I consider a totally wild take.
"I start twitching every time the word boring is used," Tom Wieckowski said, echoing a feeling I'm sure we've all had at the endless discussions about the Tour, Tadej Pogačar and the perceived boredom and dominance.
"I'm afraid I do find it dull to watch now," Will retorted (alright then, go and hunt out more tiny marginal gains in bike tech, I replied back.)
The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!
From there, the discussion descended into hyperbole, I must say. Statements like "There's no tension anymore", "Nobody bonks anymore, game's gone", "Do you not remember the Team Sky days?" and "I've never been bored by a single second of the Tour. It is life" were thrown around, as well as some popcorn emojis as the debate heated up.
Even though we got a bit silly and hyperbolic about it, this is ultimately a debate which I'm sure many friends, colleagues and fans are having at the moment. Has modern cycling taken the tension out of many Tour de France stages? Or should we all just find a bit more excitement in our lives?
We made our views clear to each other – and I'm sure we'll be bickering about this throughout the Tour – but really, we're interested to know what you, our readers, think. So we want to open the debate up to you, too. Drop a vote in the polls, and then share your thoughts in the comments, too.
Tell us what you think
Matilda is an NCTJ-qualified journalist based in the UK who joined Cyclingnews in March 2025. Prior to that, she worked as the Racing News Editor at GCN, and extensively as a freelancer contributing to Cyclingnews, Cycling Weekly, Velo, Rouleur, Escape Collective, Red Bull and more. She has reported on the ground at all of the biggest events on the calendar, including the men's and women's Tours de France, the Giro d'Italia, the Vuelta a Espana, the Spring Classics and the World Championships. She has particular experience and expertise in women's cycling, and women's sport in general. She is a graduate of modern languages and sports journalism.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.