BBB Signal Radar review: A great value cycling radar that doesn't need a bike computer

It does a lot well, while not being the best, but brings some new useful additions that make it a highly accessible option.

BBB Signal Radar light
(Image credit: © Future - Andy Turner)

Cyclingnews Verdict

For commuters who want all the benefits of a radar light but none of the required costs of bike computers, the BBB Signal Radar is a somewhat unique offering in the market.

Pros

  • +

    Can be used without any external device

  • +

    Bright and disruptive light patterns

  • +

    Solid radar range

  • +

    Very good value

  • +

    Battery port is well covered

Cons

  • -

    Can’t be removed without the mount

  • -

    Mount leaves excess strap

  • -

    Chunkier than the likes of the Wahoo option

  • -

    Battery life is not as good as others

You can trust Cyclingnews Our experts spend countless hours testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

Tech Specs: BBB Signal Radar

  • Price: £119.99 / €139.95 / $NA
  • Weight: 88g with mount
  • Light modes: 6
  • Field of view: 35˚
  • Batter life: 14 hours claimed
Latest Videos From
Swipe to scroll horizontally

Attributes

Notes

Rating

Design and aesthetics

The design is good enough, but it is not as sleek as Garmin or Wahoo, but better than Trek. The two buttons work well to control everything, and the charge port is well hidden away.

8/10

Light performance

The light performance is good, with a good array of flash patterns and modes. Not quite as bright as Wahoo or the latest Garmin, but works brilliantly in all conditions.

8/10

Radar performance

The radar is not as good as the latest Garmin, and falls a little short of the Wahoo in terms of maintaining detection of traffic that maintains distance. The FoV appears a little smaller, but the range is strong.

7/10

Practical features

I love the standalone use feature, it makes the radar far more accessible than ones that require a computer. No brake light feature or smart on/off, but mode memory is useful.

8/10

Battery and charging

The battery life is not as good as quoted, especially as quotes are for light only without radar. However it beats the CarBack in this area and isn't far from the Wahoo when brake light is active. Charges quickly and well though, with useful battery indicator.

7/10

Value for money

It's the best combination of cheaper price and high quality of performance that I have encountered. Some perform better, but cost a lot more, while others are similar price, but perform far worse. This offers the best value for money balance

10/10

Overall

Row 6 - Cell 1

80%

TOPICS
Andy Turner
Freelance writer

Freelance cycling journalist Andy Turner is a fully qualified sports scientist, cycling coach at ATP Performance, and aerodynamics consultant at Venturi Dynamics. He also spent 3 years racing as a UCI Continental professional and held a British Cycling Elite Race Licence for 7 years. He now enjoys writing fitness and tech related articles, and putting cycling products through their paces for reviews. Predominantly road focussed, he is slowly venturing into the world of gravel too, as many ‘retired’ UCI riders do.

 

When it comes to cycling equipment, he looks for functionality, a little bit of bling, and ideally aero gains. Style and tradition are secondary, performance is key.

He has raced the Tour of Britain and Volta a Portugal, but nowadays spends his time on the other side of races in the convoy as a DS, coaching riders to race wins themselves, and limiting his riding to Strava hunting, big adventures, and café rides.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.