Whether you're carrying a few essentials or regularly lugging around larger loads, one of the best cycling backpacks is going to be the most comfortable way to carry your things when riding your bike.
Sure, you could chuck your things into any old backpack and it will work adequately. With that said, the best cycling backpacks have specific cycling features, making them more comfortable, easier to pack and have specific features like special pockets, waterproof liners, and reflective details.
Best cycling backpacks
You can trust Cyclingnews Our experts spend countless hours testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.
Here's our pick of the best backpacks for cycling that we've tested at Cyclingnews, using each extensively for commuting, shopping and other duties.
Best for everyday
My pick of all the bags I have tested for general use is the Chrome Barrage. The main compartment seems to swallow up more than you would expect for its 22L size, and I found the volume perfect for everyday use. It's also just within the size limits for every airline I've ever flown with, and so is my go-to option for every press trip.
The bag features a main compartment with a laptop sleeve and an outside zipped pocket for smaller items you might need close to hand. There are two side pockets for bottles or a slim D-lock and an outer cargo net. I'm a big fan of the cargo net as you can stow all manner of items, from shoes and helmets through to massive bulk bags of pasta and 9-packs of loo roll. The wide padded shoulder straps distribute weight well and there is a chest strap to help stabilise loads when riding.
If you are riding in all weathers, the combination of thick waterproof lining and a roll-top closure means it is impervious to rain as well. The roll-top also means it's possible to expand the internal storage a little, assuming you don't still need it to be waterproof.
There are a couple of drawbacks with the Chrome Barrage that are worth acknowledging. First off, the durable construction and thick waterproof liner mean the bag is pretty heavy before you start putting anything in it. That said, our test sample has over five years of regular use and is still going strong. I also found the back panel can get a bit sweaty, and the side pockets are a bit tight when the bag is full. Despite these minor drawbacks, it's still the one I'd choose if I had to pick a single bag from this list.
For a deeper dive into why this bag is such a winner, we've got a Chrome Barrage full review after using it for a year.
2. Best small bag
Another bag from Chrome, this time it's the sling style Kadet, which is the perfect size for quick trips into town on and off the bike. The size is ideal for a few necessities of modern life, such as my camera, an extra layer, a few snacks, a tool and a tube. When it's not fully loaded, the bag can be cinched down using the outer straps. Although all the weight is all on one shoulder, the smaller capacity and wide strap mean the Kadet is still comfortable when its 9L capacity is fully loaded.
Although I found the outer canvas material was able to shrug off the odd shower, the Kadet is not fully waterproof, so seek shelter in a downpour if you are carrying electronics.
Finally, the Kadet's party piece is the built-in D-lock holster. Instead of mounting a lock to your bike or slipping it into your belt loops for quick transport, a D-lock can be stored on the rear of the bag. I expected it to be a bit uncomfortable there, but it's never been an issue as it's sufficiently padded.
3. Best for visibility
Most cycling backpacks feature some reflective detailing to help keep you safer on the roads when riding at night, but none of them come close to the Provis Reflect360. The Reflect360 is extremely reflective, so if you are worried about being visible to cars or frequently riding in heavy traffic at night, this is the bag to go for.
Reflective materials aren't a replacement for the best bike lights, however, the effectiveness of the material used for all outer panels and straps of the Reflect360 will ensure you're starkly obvious to other road users.
While it scores a 10/10 for reflectiveness, it doesn't have the build quality of a lot of the bags on this list. It's also not waterproof, although it could be supplemented with an equally reflective waterproof cover from the same brand, and you'll be sorted for all weathers.
Other than its reflective nature, the Reflect360 is most like a normal, non-cycling backpack of any on the list. The 30L capacity is large, and there is a dedicated laptop compartment inside. I like how the long zip allows you to open the bag almost like a clam to fish out whatever may be lurking inside.
Despite its drawbacks in terms of construction, it'd be the one I'd be taking if I had to undertake a commute somewhere with heavy traffic.
4. Best drybag
If you're looking for a bag for riding in wet conditions, a simple dry-bag style backpack is your best bet for keeping your items dry. Best known for its panniers for bicycle touring, Ortlieb's Commuter Daypack is a simple roll-top backpack made from durable nylon fabric
The roll top closes with a hook and loop system, which will last longer than Velcro or plastic buckles. My 21L backpack is ample for daily use and beyond, but there is also a larger 27L option for larger loads. Internally, it's essentially one large compartment, although Ortlieb includes a laptop sleeve and some organisational pockets that come on a removable insert, so if you do need to use it to chuck wet gear in on the regular, you can take it out. The space is a bit formless though, and there is no way of cinching the bag down to stop items moving around if your traveling light.
Externally, there are loops for mounting accessories like lights, and there is an external pocket with a waterproof zipper to store things you might need to quickly grab.
To avoid absorbing water, there is very little padding in the straps. Although this does mean that they aren't the most comfortable, they are still wide enough to distribute the load. For safety fans, there is a lack of any real reflectivity beyond a reflective logo, so to be seen, you've got to take advantage of the aforementioned lighting loops.
If the price is too much, then Ortlieb does make a cheaper but extremely similar 'City' version; the one here is the 'Urban'. Bonus points if you can spot the differences.
5. Best budget drybag
The Altura Thunderstorm is a more affordable and more basic alternative to the Ortlieb Commuter Daypack. The Thunderstorm features a hook and loop secured roll-top closure and has a nearly identical capacity. To make it more affordable, Altura foregoes the removable storage and instead has a fixed padded laptop sleeve that fits a 15" laptop. There is no external pocket; instead, there's an internal zipped pocket and a key loop.
The lower portion is covered in reflective dashes on the sides and the rear, so it quite literally stands out. There are also light loops on the sides and rear, so you can be seen from all angles when out on the road.
The straps were comfortable and there is a waist and chest strap, the latter of which can be adjusted up and down for a better fit.
While it's not necessarily a dealbreaker, the roll top closure is quite basic, only offering three loops to hook the securing strap, rather than being able to be cinched down tight. Also, the opening aperture is partially sewn together, so it folds over more neatly. This helps keep the bag looking neat and the water out, but ultimately it reduces the size of thing you can put in the bag, which is annoying.
6. Best for volume
If maximum capacity is your priority, then the Warsaw 2.0 from Chrome should be on your radar. Chrome cut its teeth designing bags for bike messengers, so they know a thing or two about transporting large and heavy loads. The Warsaw 2.0 cavernous 55L capacity of its main compartment is capable of carrying more than you probably ever need. In all honesty, it's overkill for most use cases, but if you need a high-volume bag that's designed with cycling in mind, then this is the one to go for.
So that it's still comfortable and to avoid it hitting your helmet when riding, the Warsaw 2.0 isn't as tall as you would expect. That does mean it has to be wider, making it the widest bag I have ever used. The result is that it can impact your vision while looking behind you for incoming traffic.
The main compartment is tarp-lined, as per the majority of the Chrome bag range, and a large flap closure is secured with a chunky plastic buckle. Although it's not technically watertight, as long as the flap is securely closed, it should keep the water out. Along with the main compartment, there are a myriad of extra pockets all about the bag to stash secrets and trinkets in.
When it's not fully loaded, there are compression straps everywhere to reduce the volume. These can also be used in many different configurations to lash awkwardly shaped items to the outside if the huge internal capacity is not enough.
It's not cheap, it only comes in black, but it won't let you down. If you need to go bigger (think carefully here!), Chrome also has a Pro version of the winning Barrage model that offers a gargantuan 80 litres of haulage capacity.
7. Best for travelling
When it comes to backpacks for riding, there are two approaches: you can choose a specific cycling backpack, or you can also choose a general backpack that is good for cycling.
If you're looking for a backpack for general use that also includes some cycling, then the Patagonia Black Hole is my recommendation, especially for use while travelling (just watch out for those airport hand luggage allowances).
The straps and back panelling are more akin to a hiking bag than one designed for commuting. It's a really comfortable backpack to wear on and off the bike, so it's perfect for all-day use. Most bike-specific bags seem to lack good internal organisation, but the Black Hole excels here. The separate compartments are well thought out, with a large main compartment, an upper cubby for things like glasses or your liquids, and further slots and pouches within each. The real star is the laptop compartment, which unzips from the rear panel rather than being accessed from the outer face. It's a minor detail, but if you're anywhere with an increased risk of theft, it's a bonus for sure.
While not waterproof, the main recycled TPU-film laminate fabric is plasticised so it'll shrug off a heavy shower if you're caught outside.
Let's not kid ourselves, aesthetics are important. Many of the cycling backpacks look just as described, like they are for cycling. The Black Hole looks the most normal of the bunch, which will definitely appeal to some, and it comes in six colour options..
8. Best for style
The Brooks Pickwick is a backpack that is far better suited to short commutes on a posh bike in good weather. The waxed canvas finish has a timeless classic style which will develop a unique patina over time, adding character and sophistication, making it my style pick of all the bags I have tested.
Although the high-quality construction means it’s built to last for years, this wouldn't be my pick for a workhorse backpack. It's only water-resistant and lacks any organisational pockets or reflective details.
The Pickwick doesn't have any back panelling, and the shoulder straps are unpadded, making it less comfortable and a bit sweat-prone, especially on longer rides.
There is a lot of form over function here, but it's also the only bag on this list that doesn't look 'technical', which will certainly appeal to some of you for both on and off the bike.
9. Best messenger bag
An alternative to a cycling backpack is the messenfer bag, which offers quick and easy access without taking the bag off. Simply unclip the stabilising second strap, spin it round to your front, and reach in to grab whatever is inside.
These style bags became popular with bike messengers, but even if you're not a messenger and have just watched Premium Rush too many times, a messenger bag is still an excellent option. In my opinion, it's hard to beat the Chrome Citizen.
I used one myself every day for years to commute to work. The build quality was impeccable, and the wide shoulder strap only became uncomfortable with really heavy loads. The tarp liner was also so waterproof that I used it as a drinks cooler full of ice on one hot evening.
The lack of structure means that they best handle softer cargo rather than anything hard and angular (my tip is to put your clothes at the back of your bag so they act as a cushion), but the flip side to this is that when the bag is emptier, it easily conforms to your body and is less obtrusive than a backpack.
10. Best for heavy loads
Although the Ortlieb Messenger could fit inside the Chrome Warsaw 2.0, its 39L capacity is still definitely a large option. For most people I think its about as large as you'd want to go for general use. Like the Warsaw 2.0, it carries larger loads in surprising comfort, thanks mostly to good straps and excellent back padding.
Thats where the similarities end though. While both bags are large options, and one nominally with messengers in mind, the Ortlieb Messenger is the polar opposite in terms of design. Ortlieb has kept it simple with just one main cavity. No internal organisation, no laptop sleeve, no light loops, no reflective details. Just a well-built, large, waterproof hold-all with a roll top closure. It's big enough to fit all the shopping in too, provided you're sticking to a basket, not a trolley.
While I rate it in terms of construction and its simplicity, my main bugbear with the Messenger is the closure. It's a rolltop, secured with a Velcro strap, but the strap itself isn't very long, so when the bag is full to the brim, it doesn't feel so secure. Also, because Velcro wears out eventually, I'd rather see a hooked closure similar to the one used on the Ortlieb Commuter Daypack.
How to choose the right cycling backpack for you
- How much storage do you need? Capacity should be your first consideration; there's no point investing in a bag that doesn't have space for everything you need to carry. While it may seem like bigger is better, a bag that's too big can be bulky and flap around when not filled up.
- What are you carrying? If you're just carrying clothes or shopping, then a single large compartment will work fine. However, if you need a bit of organisation for office supplies or travel essentials, look for a bag with some additional pockets and a laptop sleeve.
- Do you need any additional features? Most of the best cycling backpacks will have commuting-specific features such as rear light mounts, bike lock storage, waterproof covers or additional straps for carrying bulky items.
- Do you ride in the rain? All the bags on this list have some level of water resistance, but if you're a committed commuter, then I would recommend opting for a properly waterproof option. The last thing you want is to arrive at work with your office clothes soaking wet from a rainy commute.
Everything you need to know about the best cycling backpacks
Not everyone's needs are the same, and so not everyone should buy the same thing. In my opinion the Chrome Barrage will tick most boxes for most people in most situations, but it may not be right for you, so below I've tried my best to answer all the key questions you may have so that you can ultimately make the best purchase possible.
What should I look for in a cycling backpack?
Like any backpack, a cycling backpack should be comfortable to wear, and have enough capacity to carry what you need to carry. The primary use for cycling backpacks is commuting, so with the exception of the Chrome Kadet, every bag on this list can easily hold a laptop, a packed lunch, a change of clothes and one of the best bike locks.
Beyond that, you'll want to look for waterproofing if you ride in the rain, reflective details or light mounts if you're going to use it at night, or a higher capacity if you intend on throwing more stuff into it on a regular basis. Wide, comfortable straps are a minimum requirement for both comfort and stability too; nobody wants a bag that flops from side to side as they ride. This is primarily why you don't see many cycling backpacks with a suspended, vented back as you do with hiking bags: That would put the load further away from your body on a bouncy spring, which is an effective recipe for a wobbly time.
One final big decision is whether you go for an organised or unorganised compartment. Unorganised bags, i.e. just a void with no extra slots or pockets, mean that none of the capacity is wasted on pockets you may never use; you can simply chuck anything of any shape in at any time until it's full. On the flip side, particularly for commuting, it can be handy to at least have a dedicated laptop sleeve for protection as much as organisation.
Is it harder to ride with a backpack?
Adding any load to your overall setup is going to make life harder, that's just physics, so if it's for commuting the best thing you can do is leave as much at work as you can get away with.
For smaller loads a cycling backpack, provided it's well-designed, isn't going to make life all that much harder. For bigger loads though, or for longer commutes, you'll probably be more comfortable with a single or pair of panniers.
The main thing to consider is saddle comfort; having the best saddle for you is key, and why many people opt for a leather saddle for commuting, as once broken in you can do away with the cycling shorts. Adding extra kilograms to your upper body adds a corresponding load to your sit bones, so making sure you have an appropriate and comfortable saddle is paramount, plus probably a set of the best cycling shorts too.
Can I cycle with a hiking backpack?
Of course you can, and there are a tonne of absolutely capable hiking bags out there. If you're a regular hiker and an infrequent commuter then this may well be a great use of your money, but they're perhaps less suited to cycling than you'd think.
Waterproofing for hiking bags often takes the form of a waterproof cover, which is perfect when walking at 5km/h, but can get very flappy when you're cruising to work at six times that speed. Waterproof cycling backpacks are waterproof as part of their construction, so no flapping.
As mentioned earlier too, hiking backpacks with suspended, vented backs are great for hiking in hot weather, but they have a tendency to create a very wobbly load when you add in the left/right swap of pedalling.
How big should a cycling backpack be?
The simple answer is "big enough to fit all you need to carry", but I'll admit that's not overly helpful when checking a stats list. In my experience, something between 20 and 30 litres is the sweet spot. Below that, it starts to get tricky to get a commuting load in, and above that they get cumbersome.
If you do need bigger loads, then stability becomes more key. The Ortlieb messenger is giant but still very stable, and while the Chrome Warsaw is gargantuan, it has enough compression straps to shrink its effective size when not full to the brim.
Are cycling backpacks waterproof?
Most are, yes, but not all. If you commute in the rain, or think you might in the future then this should be top of your spec list. Arriving at the office with soggy clothes and a dead computer isn't going to make for a happy day.
Some cycling backpacks are said to be waterproof, but this may only extend to the main compartment. For a setup absolutely impervious to water ingress, a drybag-style cycling backpack like the Ortlieb Commuter Daypack is your best bet. It lacks any real external pockets to allow stuff to get soggy by accident, and a roll top closure is the best option to keep out water.
Are cycling backpacks comfortable?
Some are more than others, but I've tested each and every one on this list to confirm they are. If comfort is your number one priority, then look for something with wide, padded straps and a padded, but ventilated back.
The bigger the load the more comfort becomes a factor too; notice how the Ortlieb Messenger has thicker padding than the Commuter Daypack from the same brand to deal with the added payload.
Do I need a waist strap?
I'd say a chest strap is vital for stability, but the jury is out on waist straps. Personally, I find them restrictive. I never use them, and remove them if possible, but I have friends who treat them as a requirement. They're certainly more useful for stabilising bags with a round profile; I'm talking the drybag style options primarily.
In short, they can be handy for some people, but I personally wouldn't let them be a dealbreaker if the rest of the spec list floats your boat.
How do we test the best cycling backpacks?
I don't own a car, so all of my trips around town, to and from work, and for all of my shopping I do by bike. That means I've been using these bags to carry all sorts of stuff from place to place, and in all weathers too as I don't have the option to just hop in the car if it's raining and I've run out of milk again.
The big weekly grocery shop, trips to the pub, and commuting to the office all form part of my testing. I've even used the larger ones to transport the smaller ones to the office in a cycling backpack Russian Doll arrangement.
My commute is also an hour each way, which is about the limit of what I think a cycling backpack should be able to handle, so it forms an ideal test in that regard. Beyond that, I'd want to look at panniers.
