Skip to main content

Prudhomme calls for independent body to deal with mechanical doping

Image 1 of 5

Tour de France race director Christian Prudhomme with Gary Verity

Tour de France race director Christian Prudhomme with Gary Verity (Image credit: ASO)
Image 2 of 5

UCI Technical Manager Mark Barfield explains the UCI's test for mechanical doping

UCI Technical Manager Mark Barfield explains the UCI's test for mechanical doping (Image credit: Stephen Farrand)
Image 3 of 5

David Lappartient is one of the three candidates

David Lappartient is one of the three candidates (Image credit: Jean-François Quénet)
Image 4 of 5

Tour director Christian Prudhomme would have been happy with today's stage

Tour director Christian Prudhomme would have been happy with today's stage (Image credit: Tim de Waele/
Image 5 of 5

Christian Prudhomme announcing the 2016 Tour de France route

Christian Prudhomme announcing the 2016 Tour de France route (Image credit: ASO)

Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme has said that the UCI needs to provide an explanation for technical manager Mark Barfield’s decision to alert Typhoon e-bike CEO Harry Gibbings of a French police investigation into mechanical doping during last year’s Tour. He also called for an independent body to deal with the issue of mechanical doping instead of the UCI.

A report on the Stade 2 programme on Sunday evening showed that Barfield had sent an email to Gibbings after French police reportedly voiced concerns to the UCI about the presence of Hungarian engineer Stefano Varjas on the race. Varjas worked with Typhoon bikes until December of last year.

Gibbings told Cyclingnews on Monday that Varjas denied being on the Tour when he contacted him, though receipts he later submitted for expenses purposes apparently showed that he was in France at the time. In a statement on Monday morning, the UCI expressed “full confidence” in its staff.

“It’s surprising to say the least. It demands an explanation, that’s for sure,” Prudhomme told Stade 2.

Prudhomme queried why thermal imaging has not been incorporated into the UCI's existing testing process. He said that he had raised the topic with Barfield when he met with him during last week’s Critérium du Dauphiné.

“I said to him that even if he didn’t believe in thermal imaging, it should be used because no method is infallible and you should use every available methodology at your disposal to find cheats,” Prudhomme said.

“He said he thought it was a good idea because he wanted to show that thermal cameras don’t work. But he needed to speak to his superior, Martin Gibbs the director general of the UCI. I don’t know why they don’t use cameras as a complement to the existing testing.”

The UCI and Tour organisers ASO are currently at an impasse over the proposed reforms of the WorldTour which were due to be rolled out for the 2017 season. In December, ASO announced that its races – including the Tour de France, Vuelta a España and Paris-Roubaix – would not be part of the WorldTour in 2017.

Earlier in the year, Prudhomme suggested that improving efforts to combat mechanical doping was something of a pre-requisite to negotiating with the UCI on the WorldTour structures. Speaking to Stade 2 on Sunday, Prudhomme complained that the UCI had carried out tests for mechanical doping at the under-23 Liège-Bastogne-Liège in April, but then failed to do so at the Monument Classic itself the following weekend.

“You see in world sport today that there are scandals across various disciplines. The sporting movement as a whole needs to be reformed. There needs to be a body independent of the federations that carries out the controls, that’s for certain,” Prudhomme told Stade 2.

“An independent body is needed to deal with fraud – whatever it may be – and not the sports bodies themselves.”

Lappartient’s letter

Prudhomme’s comments follow the publication of excerpts from a letter sent by European Cycling Union president David Lappartient to UCI president Brian Cookson in early June, in which he outlined his concerns about the current direction of the governing body and its ongoing impasse with ASO.

Lappartient is also UCI vice-president and president of the French Cycling Federation, and the letter, published by on Saturday, will only fuel speculation that he might run against Cookson for the UCI presidency in 2017, with the implicit backing of ASO.

After expressing dismay at the stand-off with ASO, Lappartient proceeded to question the UCI’s current procedures in combating technological fraud. “I wonder about the effectiveness of the tablets used by the UCI. What is the scientific validation for the efficiency?” Lappartient wrote. “You wrote that 100 percent of cases are detectable: are we sure of that? Why systematically refuse other testing methords (X-rays, thermal imaging)?

“Finally, we’re surprised by conditions in which the tablets can be sold to national federations. It seems to us that the efficacy of the fight against technological fraud should prevail over the business generated by these controls.”

Lappartient’s document also criticised the UCI’s abortive trial of disc brakes in the professional peloton and questioned a rebate of around €1 million that was granted to the organising committee of the Richmond World Championships. He also expressed concerns that the track programme could be eliminated from the Olympic Games and called for anti-doping efforts in cycling to be managed by an agency external to the UCI, a statement echoed by Prudhomme on Sunday. 

Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1