Best heart rate monitors of 2024 - Accurately track your training and health

When used correctly, the best heart rate monitors can help you unlock a new level of athletic performance, no matter whether you're cycling, running, or performing any other endurance sport.

Their most basic requirement is to provide consistently accurate heart rate data - measured in beats per minute (BPM). They then need to connect to a smartphone, computer or other device to transmit this data to be recorded. 

But as is often the case, and as I've found in over two years of testing heart rate monitors, not all are created equal, even when they do manage those basic needs. For example, the Garmin HRM Pro Plus is by far the most feature-rich in this list, with accelerometers that measure advanced running metrics, but it will come at a premium. For a more affordable choice that does the basics well, the Polar H9 is the one I'd buy and I think most people would be happy with how it performs. Of course, you may have specific requirements for your circumstances, so read on for help choosing the best heart rate monitor for you. 

The other reviewers and I here at Cyclingnews all prefer the original chest strap design, as it's still the best for accuracy, but optical sensors built into forearm straps or smartwatches are also popular for their comfort, so we've not excluded those entirely.  

For the past two years, I've been using all of the heart rate monitors below and more - often two or three at a time - to work out which is best. I looked for easy connectivity, consistent and accurate measurement, good battery life and a comfortable secure fit. I also tested out each product's extra features like onboard memory and accelerometers, and have compiled my pick of the best heart rate monitors below. 

Best heart rate monitors: Quick list

Best heart rate monitors available today

Best heart rate monitor for cycling

Polar claims the H10 is the most accurate on the market - accurate to +/- one millisecond - thanks to a third electrode and silicone grippers to keep it in place. In over two years of testing, I haven't had a single issue, so cannot refute those claims. With that said, given most other chest straps here have performed similarly well, I wouldn't buy the H10 for that reason alone. 

The reason I would buy it is the super-simple adjustment and extremely comfortable, secure fit. The added bonus of silicone grippers is that you can run it looser than usual without it slipping, and while I don't personally suffer much from chest strap discomfort, I know it's an issue that plagues a few. Swapping to an optical sensor such as a smartwatch is one option, but the downside to that is a reduction in the accuracy of your data, which is common with optical sensors. 

Comfort aside, the H10 is entirely waterproof, can be worn while swimming and can also record your heart rate variability — though you'll need to use it in combination with one of the brand's smartwatches to take advantage. It can connect to two concurrent devices with Bluetooth, and it uses a CR2025 (2.5mm thick) battery, rather than the more common 3.2mm thick CR2032. 

Best budget heart rate monitor

By far the cheapest on this list, the Wahoo Tickr is the best budget heart rate monitor for anyone who wants a no-frills chest strap without all the bells and whistles with both Bluetooth and ANT+ and a strong warranty in the case of issues. 

The strap connects via the two snap-on buttons at the pod. This means they come in close contact with your (often sweaty) skin, which can accelerate corrosion if you don't keep on top of washing it. It also means the Tickr gets switched off when you remove it, which helps battery life. Despite this, although Wahoo claims around 500 hours of use before the CR2032 coin cell battery needs replacing, I've found it usually lasts around half that (which is still plenty, and forgivable at this price). The battery cover is secure - it's dust and waterproof rated to IPX7 - and is easily removed with a coin, meaning battery changes take just seconds.

Adjustment of the strap is a fairly straightforward affair, too, but it does require both hands and is easier to do when removed. It holds pretty well though, so should be a one-time job. 

For ease of use, the Tickr range can simultaneously connect to three devices, which is particularly useful for indoor cycling, as it enables you to control your headwind fan whilst riding on Zwift via your laptop, or track your heart rate via a cycling computer and a phone at the same time. In our testing, data has been consistent and accurate, tracking within a single BPM against the more expensive Tickr X on both average and maximum heart rates. 

I've experienced a handful of data drops during testing, which is clearly something to bear in mind, but a few seconds of lost data isn't something I'm ever worried about in a normal training session. If you are, however, Wahoo support has never let me down in the past, so I'd still be happy to recommend the Tickr to anyone with a keen eye on budget.

Best value heart rate monitor

The Polar H9 doesn't come with any added bells or whistles like onboard memory or accelerometers. It's not the cheapest here (the Wahoo Tickr wins that crown), and Garmin's HRM Dual offers a better battery life. However, when you combine everything into a single device, the Polar H9 is my favourite heart rate monitor for 'basic function', ie monitoring my heart rate while cycling or running, and the reasons are as follows: 

Firstly, in my testing, it has provided more accurate and consistent data than the cheaper Wahoo Tickr, which makes it worth the slightly higher price in my opinion. Secondly, while the Garmin HRM Dual is equally accurate, it is a little more expensive again. Thirdly, it's a darn sight easier to adjust the strap on the H9 than on the HRM Dual, and finally, when it comes time to change the battery, the H9 can be done in seconds (just prize away the flap with a flathead screwdriver or similarly-shaped utensil) while the HRM Dual requires a tiny screwdriver to remove four small screws. 

To cap it off, it's comfortable and stays secure, so unless you're specifically chasing a truly budget price, a huge battery, or need the added features, this is the best heart rate monitor for you.

Best heart rate monitor for battery life

The HRM Dual is Garmin's answer to budget heart rate tracking, but its retail price is still more expensive than both Wahoo's Tickr and Polar's H9. 

With that said, it can often be found discounted, which increases its appeal. Where it stands out is with its claimed 3.5-year battery life (assuming an hour per day on average) and the ability to monitor heart rate variability (when paired with an appropriate app). 

Beyond that, the HRM Dual is a reasonably basic heart rate monitor, so it doesn't come with the bells and whistles of onboard memory and swim/run dynamics. Its construction also leaves a little to be desired, as the three-part adjustment system is unnecessarily complex to use. This is frustrating because Garmin clearly knows how to do it well, as the more expensive HRM Pro is by far the easiest to adjust on this list. 

Furthermore, it's a good job the battery life is so good because when it comes to replacing the CR2032 inside, there are four tiny screws which are fiddly and easy to damage. And that assumes you have a screwdriver small enough in the first place since it doesn't come with one. 

Unless you're specifically after huge battery life, then in my opinion, the Polar H9 is a better choice at their respective recommended retail prices. I'd buy it at a discount though, and given that's a common occurrence, I've included it in the list. 

Best heart rate monitor for Zwift

The 4iiii Viiiiva is my pick as the best heart rate monitor for Zwift for a couple of reasons. The first of those is its ability to act as an ANT+ to Bluetooth bridge. Most smart trainers, power meters and heart rate monitors these days can work with Bluetooth, but too many connections can cause dropouts, and some devices such as Apple TVs and cheaper laptops have a limit on the number they can work with at one time. Running the smart trainer and power meter via ANT+ to your heart rate monitor, and then transmitting all three data streams via Bluetooth to your laptop frees up valuable Bluetooth channels so you can listen to music through your headphones, or use your wireless keyboard to talk to your fellow Zwifters!

The second reason is that it also stores up to 65 hours of your ride data, so that if your file corrupts, you can recover it. Nobody likes to lose their data, but if you race on Zwift in races where dual recording is required, it could save you bragging rights or even prize money. 

Beyond those two key USPs, the Viiiiva is a decent all-rounder too. I've not had it long enough to get through 160 hours of riding, but reassuringly I'm still on the first battery. I've not seen a single power dropout yet, both when connected to an Apple Watch, an iPhone, a bike computer, TrainerRoad and Zwift. 

Best heart rate monitor for running

The HRM Pro Plus is the best heart rate monitor in Garmin's range, with both ANT+ and (unlike the brand's HRM-Run or Swim) Bluetooth compatibility. 

It's the highest-priced chest strap on this list, but it does come with a long list of added features. Whether you actually need them is a question you'll need to ask yourself. 

It features onboard memory, and will automatically measure your heart rate data and then push it to your device when you next connect it to Garmin Connect. For cyclists, it'll easily pair with your Zwift-running device or any brand of cycling computer. And for dedicated runners, it can also track detailed running metrics such as ground contact time, stride length and more. These are seriously impressive metrics, but you do need one of Garmin's smartwatches to take advantage of some, you can't access them all via a smartphone. 

The strap is by far the easiest on this list to adjust; it's a one-handed affair and it doesn't self-loosen over time, it also stays put without being worn too tightly.

Like many others here, the battery is a CR2032 coin cell and Garmin claims it will last around 12 months, with an hour's use per day, which equates to 365 hours of training time between changes. My personal testing saw a lifespan of around half this, but integrating the heart rate monitor into my daily training regime alongside all the others in this list is more anecdote than science. 

Thankfully, the battery change on the HRM Pro Plus is a much more straightforward affair than it was on the older HRM Pro. 

The pod itself cannot be removed from the strap, which means washing needs to be done by hand, rather than through the washing machine, and Garmin suggests you do that after seven workouts or after every pool swim. For those planning on swimming a lot, the HRM-Swim does come with a wider strap, which helps it stay put better, especially useful for those not wearing a wetsuit, swimsuit or triathlon vest over the top. 

Best heart rate monitor for 24-hour tracking

Buying a Whoop 4.0 requires a monthly subscription that not only gives you the wrist strap itself but access to Whoop's extensive heart rate, respiratory rate, blood oxygen and skin-temperature monitoring app. Whoop's premise is built primarily on heart rate variability (HRV), which is basically the variation in time between each of your heart's beats, measured in milliseconds. 

The theory is that a higher HRV (when compared to your individual average) means you are fresher, or more recovered. Wear the Whoop 24/7 and it will collect this data alongside your activities to monitor your strain vs recovery (incl. sleep) and provide guidance on how to improve. It's a seriously deep data dive that most people won't need, but for committed athletes looking to optimise their life around training, it could be the tool to unlock the next level of performance. 

It's clever in that the charger is a portable slide-on battery pack that you wear, and the device itself is waterproof enough to be worn in the pool, the shower, or the sea so you'll never lose a moment's data. However, bear in mind charging is necessary every three to four days. Using the app, you can even relay the heart rate to third-party devices such as cycling computers, should you want to avoid using a chest strap at the same time, and when your Whoop detects an activity, it will not only automatically figure out if it was a ride, a run, mountain biking or more (which it's really good at) and it can then be synced to Strava, Training Peaks or Apple Health. 

You need to ensure it's tight against the skin for consistent results, but in my testing, I've found it to be accurate enough for its purpose of tracking overall fatigue and freshness, even if the beat-by-beat measurement might be less perfect than chest straps during exercise. 

Best heart rate monitor watch

When I originally wrote this guide, I threw in 'whichever smartwatch you already own' as a bit of a leftfield option, basically because most of them monitor your heart rate without having to buy a dedicated strap. Today I've upgraded that option to specifically call out the Garmin Epix series, because it offers every function you need from an everyday smartwatch, such as the time, alarms, notifications, contactless pay, and on-device Spotify music, alongside GPS tracking and workout metrics such as Vo2 Max, pace, stride length and so on. You can even pair it with the HRM Pro Plus above for super thorough running metrics, but its an expensive pairing that only the most committed athletes will benefit from.

Ironically, I actually personally prefer the Apple Watch Ultra over the Garmin Epix ecosystem, and if like me you're not all that interested in checking your vertical oscillation when running, and (importantly) you own an iPhone, then the Apple range might be your pick too. However, the battery life on the Epix is... well... epic, at around two weeks between charge, while the Apple devices are a couple of days at most. The Garmin also works equally well no matter your choice of phone, while the Apple Watches are, naturally, slightly more integrated with iPhones. 

Regardless of your choice, the main thing they both offer is the ability and convenience to wear them 24-7. They'll give you a heads up if your heart rate starts beating an irregular rhythm, and they'll be ready to hand - almost literally - whenever  you start your ride, run, swim or Extreme-Ironing session. 

How to choose a heart rate monitor

Unfortunately, as is often the way, there isn't one best heart rate monitor for everyone; each has its pros and cons. Choosing a heart rate monitor is a decision you'll need to make based on your needs, so the first step, naturally, will be understanding what those needs are. 

Do you prioritise accurate heart rate data during exercise over the convenience of wearing something all day like a smartwatch? If so, then a chest strap is going to be the best heart rate monitor for you. 

Are you a multisport athlete who wants to be able to track your running or swimming metrics in addition to your heart rate? If so, then one of the more high-spec heart rate monitors will be needed, such as the Tickr X (for running) or the Garmin HRM Pro (for running and swimming). 

Alternatively, if your reasons for tracking heart rate are not directly related to exercise, but more that you want to track it in everyday life, a wearable such as a smartwatch or a fitness tracker like the Whoop would likely be a better heart rate monitor for you. 

Those are some of the basics, but no doubt as you've worked through my list of recommendations above, you'll have had some questions about some of the jargon and terminology I've used. Below, I've rounded up some of the more common questions in order to help you make your decision. 

How do we test the best heart rate monitors?

My testing for this guide to the best heart rate monitors has been an ongoing process for almost two years. Each test starts with an unboxing, during which I make a note of the packaging for its eco-friendliness. All brands use some form of plastic in their packaging, but I usually find Wahoo is the best in this regard. 

For chest straps, I then read the care instructions and make a note of washing recommendations, before removing the battery cover in a trial run battery swap, noting the difficulty. Next up comes the adjustment, and working out how easy - or difficult - it is to fit the strap. On the chest straps, Garmin's HRM Pro Plus wins this, with close seconds coming to both Polar options. 

Next, I research the claimed features and qualities of each heart rate monitor and try out these features during testing to confirm they do what they should, and to experience how said feature might benefit a user's workout. 

In the absence of having a doctor with an ECG machine on hand for all of my workouts, I improvised a way to confirm accurate readings. Throughout testing, I spend a time wearing three (sometimes four) heart rate monitors for my workouts - two chest straps and one or two wrist straps, depending on what I'm testing. This compares the readings for each heart rate monitor against at least two others and lets me weed out any devices with inaccurate data or poor connectivity. As is widely accepted, the chest straps performed best here, while optical wrist sensors tended to struggle to keep up with quick changes up or down, especially when running or mountain biking, as this shakes the wrists more than indoor cycling.  

I then set them all to the same length before wearing them individually to note comfort and how securely they stay in place. Thankfully all heart rate monitors I've tested have been comfortable enough that they are easily forgotten once in place, but I do find the Polar H10 is most comfortable and secure.