Skip to main content

Report: Astana facing March 20 deadline for licence defence

Image 1 of 5

Astana manager Alexander Vinokourov at the Dubai Tour

Astana manager Alexander Vinokourov at the Dubai Tour
(Image credit: Tim de Waele/TDWSport.com)
Image 2 of 5

The 2015 Astana team

The 2015 Astana team
(Image credit: Bettini Photo)
Image 3 of 5

Alexander Vinokourov presents the 2015 Astana team in Dubai

Alexander Vinokourov presents the 2015 Astana team in Dubai
(Image credit: Bettini Photo)
Image 4 of 5

Vincenzo Nibali (Astana) at the Dubai Tour.

Vincenzo Nibali (Astana) at the Dubai Tour.
(Image credit: Bettini Photo)
Image 5 of 5

UCI president Brian Cookson

UCI president Brian Cookson
(Image credit: briancookson.org)

The Astana team has until March 20 to prepare its defence and response to the UCI's request to revoke its licence according to a report in the L'Equipe newspaper.

The UCI formally requested that its Licence Commission revoke the Kazakhstan team's WorldTour licence after an audit by the Institute of Sport Sciences of the University of Lausanne (ISSUL) of the team's anti-doping culture, policies, structures and management systems. The UCI also claimed that it has now received important evidence from the Padua police investigation. This was not available when the UCI Licence Commission granted the Astana team a 2015 licence in December.

"After careful review of this extensive report, the UCI strongly believes that it contains compelling grounds to refer the matter to the Licence Commission and request the Astana Pro Team licence be withdrawn," read a statement from the UCI's communications department last week.

According to L'Equipe, the Astana team has until March 20 – two days before Milan-San Remo, to submit its response to the Licence Commission. No date has yet been decided for an eventual hearing.

Astana was given a 2015 WorldTour licence despite a series of doping scandals during the 2014 season. However UCI President Brian Cookson told Cyclingnews that the team "were drinking in the last chance saloon."

When awarding the initial licence the UCI warned that any further "deficiencies or in case of faulty implementation of the internal operational requirements", or if the UCI confirms the offences brought in the Padua case, it "would prompt a referral to the Licence Commission to envisage, if necessary, the withdrawal of the licence."