Former British Cycling doctor Richard Freeman banned for anti-doping violation

Former Team Sky and British Cycling doctor Richard Freeman has been handed a four-year ban for violating anti-doping rules, including possession of a prohibited substance and “tampering” with an anti-doping investigation.

Freeman, had his medical license revoked in 2021 due to misconduct, was ruled by UK Anti-Doping (UKAD) to have violated the organisation’s rules on three counts – “by taking possession of an order of 30 sachets of Testogel [testosterone – Ed.], and lying to UKAD in respect of that order”.

His ban will be backdated to the start of his provisional suspension, which began on December 22, 2020. Freeman declined to attend the anti-doping tribunal and, in January of this year, lost his appeal to the High Court over the revocation of his medical license.

The case dates back to 2011, when Freeman ordered the Testogel to British Cycling’s headquarters in Manchester. He was charged by UKAD over the offences in February 2021 and admitted that he had “lied about the events to UKAD, to my solicitor and legal team”, though denied that the testosterone was intended for an athlete.

Instead, Freeman claimed that the delivery was in error before changing his explanation to claim that it was ordered for British Cycling coach Shane Sutton in order to treat erectile dysfunction, which Sutton denied.

UKAD’s case against Freeman was on pause while Freeman appealed to the High Court, though once the proceedings restarted in July, the National Anti-Doping Panel (NADP) found both charges against him proven.

Evidence of the Testogel delivery first came to light during an UKAD investigation into a ‘jiffy bag’ investigation surrounding a delivery to Freeman at the 2011 Critérium du Dauphiné, won by Sky’s Bradley Wiggins.

The 2016 investigation brought a spotlight on the medical department at British Cycling’s Manchester velodrome base, bringing to light allegations of incomplete medical records and stolen laptops. Freeman was first interviewed by UKAD in 2017, while a year later a parliamentary hearing found that Team Sky and Freeman had crossed an “ethical line”by using legal medications to assist Wiggins’ performance – including a therapeutic use exemption (TUE) for corticosteroids.

”The tribunal was comfortably satisfied that Dr Freeman had ‘intended to make available to one or more of his athletes the prohibited substance delivered to the Manchester Velodrome’,” read a statement issued by UKAD.

“Whilst Dr Freeman had accepted that he had lied to UKAD about returning the Testogel to the supplier, he maintained that he had written to a non-rider member of staff requesting that they waive patient confidentiality and that they had refused to do so.

“The independent tribunal found that UKAD had also proved the second tampering violation against Dr Freeman whose ‘conduct subverted doping control’.”

Frank Slevin, the chair of British Cycling, sought to distance the organisation from Freeman and the ban handed down.

“As we have stated previously, Richard Freeman’s conduct during his employment by British Cycling bore no resemblance to the high ethical and professional standards which we, our members and our partners rightly expect,” he said.

Freeman now has 21 days in which to appeal his four-year ban.