UCI to consider extreme weather protocol

The UCI said it is working with its key stakeholders to develop protocols for handling extreme weather situations in professional races, but it did not specifically state whether it would be considering the proposal submitted by the new Association of North American Pro Road Cyclists (ANAPRC) earlier this month.

"The UCI considers the safety of riders as an absolute priority and is therefore taking this issue very seriously," a UCI spokesman told Cyclingnews. "We are currently working with key stakeholders to agree [to] protocols to be adopted if a race is affected by extremes of temperature, precipitation etc. We intend that this be approved very quickly as we are conscious of the need for clear guidelines for organisers, teams and riders on this issue."

The ANAPRC was formed earlier this year under temporary president Christian Vande Velde and interim executive director Michael Carcaise. The move was a reaction to the stage in last year's Giro d'Italia that went over the Stelvio, and the botched attempt at neutralising the stage. Some riders claimed that the poorly communicated neutralisation led to an unfair advantage for eventual winner Nairo Quintana. 

Numerous other races have been affected by harsh weather, some being cancelled, while others went forward in conditions that were brutal and sometimes dangerous for the riders. The ANAPRC developed a detailed extreme weather protocol, which it hopes the UCI will adopt, in collaboration with Cannondale-Garmin physicians Kevin Sprouse, Phil Stawski and Prentice Steffen. They asked the UCI to consider adopting a system to monitor weather conditions, and to set guidelines that would result in the automatic adoption of an alternate plan for a race or stage route, either by shortening, re-routing, neutralizing or cancelling the race or stage.

The ANAPRC proposes a cutoff of 3 degrees Celsius or lower combined with rain or wet snow, and any race affected by weather at or below those temperatures and conditions would automatically trigger a "plan B". Their proposal does not cover exactly how the UCI commissaires, race organisers and team managers would handle communicating the decisions based on the weather, and allows the race directors to come up with their own contingency plans for the stage or race.

"UCI Commissaires and race organizers will work together closely to monitor weather conditions, and maintain an ongoing discussion about how/when contingency plans would be triggered if a threshold temperature rule was in place, and how the plan would be communicated to teams, riders, broadcast partners, media, etc," the ANAPRC proposal stated.

Speaking at the Dubai Tour, board member Brent Bookwalter emphasised that the group wants to collaborate with the UCI, race organisers and teams, not be combative. “For me a big driving force for wanting to be involved is to avoid another Stelvio stage. I don't want the sport or the riders to go through something like that ever again,” Bookwalter told Cyclingnews

Thank you for reading 5 articles in the past 30 days*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read any 5 articles for free in each 30-day period, this automatically resets

After your trial you will be billed £4.99 $7.99 €5.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just £49 $79 €59

Join now for unlimited access

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1