Conclusions from the Tour of Flanders

New course fails to inspire and QuickStep rudderless without Boonen

Jury still out on new course

The Tour of Flanders is always a momentous occasion but there are concerns that it risks becoming less fascinating race due to the new route introduced last year. Once again, the circuits over the Kwaremont and Paterberg failed to fire the imagination and the race remained largely deadlocked until the final lap.

Yes, the strongest man deservedly won on Sunday, but cycling would be a sorrier spectacle if races were decided on power output alone. It took a strongman to win on the old course over the Muur and Bosberg, too – as Fabian Cancellara himself showed in 2010 – but there were also rewards on offer for riders who showed a degree of ingenuity and invention.

Sylvain Chavanel complained afterwards that the difficulty of the finale inhibits early attackers and means that the race is destined to remain blocked until the last time up the Kwaremont. The pace was high – particularly in the frenetic opening two hours - but the selection happened largely at the back of the bunch rather than the front. And while the Kwaremont-Paterberg circuit fills VIP tents and placates sponsors, it does precious little for the race as a sporting spectacle, with the favourites understandably reluctant to show their hand on the first two times up those climbs.

It’s a similar situation in the Ardennes classics, of course, where none of the real contenders budge on the earlier ascents of the Cauberg at Amstel Gold Race or the Mur de Huy at Flèche Wallonne. In recent years, the Ardennes classics have too often been reduced to a bland question of who can generate the most power on the final climb, and it is troubling to think that the Ronde might begin to follow that pattern.
Fabian Cancellara (RadioShack Leopard) flies up the Paterberg while Peter Sagan (Cannondale) begins to lose contact.
Photo: AFP

Lotto Belisol do their best to hit the jackpot

The new circuit has garnered its share of criticism, but one team did its level best to be inventive regardless. Lotto Belisol were aggressive throughout the race as they looked to pre-empt the inevitable showdown between Cancellara and Peter Sagan on the final lap over the Kwaremont and Paterberg.

André Greipel sparked a dangerous move by attacking on the Molenberg and was later joined by Marcel Sieberg. They were preparing the ground for Jurgen Roelandts, who joined a five-man move with 30km to go, and then attacked alone off the front on the final ascent of the Kwaremont. Roelandts was eventually – inevitably – joined by Cancellara and Sagan, but he got some reward for his efforts by hanging on for a third place finish in Oudenaarde. Tactically, Lotto Belisol made the best use of their riders at their disposal.
Jurgen Roelandts (Lotto Belisol) on the Tour of Flanders podium

Sky’s high life yet to pay off

In contrast to Lotto Belisol, Team Sky had precious little impact on the development of the race, with Edvald Boasson Hagen (17th) the highest finisher. There were some mitigating factors – Geraint Thomas used up a lot of energy chasing back on after crashing before the second climb of the Kwaremont – but it was a disappointing showing from the British squad.

Sky’s decision to have its classics squad train in the seclusion of Mount Teide rather than race Paris-Nice or Tirreno-Adriatico was the source of considerable intrigue before the classics, but so far, the most recent manifestation of the marginal gains philosophy has yet to pay dividends, Ian Stannard’s aggression at Milan-San Remo notwithstanding.

Directeur sportif Servais Knaven conceded afterwards that it was impossible to compete with the strength of Cancellara and Sagan, but Sky displayed a singular lack of imagination in trying to counteract them tactically. The classics require considerably greater finesse than stringing out the peloton on mountain passes as their teammates did at Tirreno-Adriatico or Critérium International recent. Sky needs a result to salvage its cobbled campaign at Paris-Roubaix next weekend.
The Tour of Flanders rolls out of Brugge
Photo: Sirotti

QuickStep out of rhythm

When the season started it was widely acknowledged that a repeat of the 2012 invincible season would be almost impossible to achieve. Lightening couldn’t strike twice and with a returning Cancellara, a hungry Sagan and a limping Boonen, Omega Pharma-QuickStep was a team with a target on its back.

However as the races ticked by, and the wins and podiums slipped through their fingers, the Belgian dynasty appeared to run out of ideas. By the time of their Flanders press conference Lefevere almost knew that the game was up: Sagan and Cancellara were too strong, even with a morale-boosting win in De Panne to give them hope.

Of course it’s fair to say that if Cancellara or Sagan are taken out of the equation, both of their teams would struggle for Classics results too, but Lefevere and his staff could have seen Boonen’s struggles before Flanders a mile off.

Sylvain Chavanel never really seemed to have the entire commitment of his team – although he never really called for it either – and Niki Terptra has been too inconsistent of late.

Roubaix is less than a week away and Lefevere’s reaction to this Flanders set back will be crucial. Terpstra isn’t in the same form he was last year and Chavanel doesn’t have the best track record on the pavé. Will they go for broke in a bid to thwart Cancellara or will the house fold and wait for next year?
An early race crash prevented Belgian champion Tom Boonen (Omega Pharma-QuickStep) from defending his Tour of Flanders title.
Photo: Bettini

RadioShack startle with strength in depth

While Fabian Cancellara’s strength has never been in doubt, the ability of his team has been questioned ever since he left the Bjarne Riis stable to join the nascent Leopard project in 2011. That spring, Cancellara was left isolated and frustrated in the finale of both the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix, and as recently as Friday afternoon, manager Luca Guercilena admitting to reporters that his team was not as strong as the likes of BMC and Omega Pharma-QuickStep.

On Sunday, however, RadioShack pulled out a surprisingly committed collective performance. Hayden Roulston put in a mammoth stint on the front of the peloton on the first circuit of the Kwaremont-Paterberg circuit but Stijn Devolder’s showing ahead of the finale was particularly remarkable.

Devolder had reportedly travelled to Spain for a mini training camp during the week and he showed the fruits of the trip by sitting at the front of the bunch and controlling affairs ahead of the final circuit over the Kwaremont and Paterberg. The Belgian’s display was all the more striking given that he had punctured shortly beforehand and had to give chase alone.

Four lacklustre years on from his second Tour of Flanders win in 2009, Devolder’s wholly unexpected reanimation played an important part in Cancellara’s win.
RadioShack Leopard riders set tempo
Photo: Photopress

Cancellara the overwhelming favourite for Paris-Roubaix

It’s déjà vu all over again. Three years ago, Cancellara’s emphatic Ronde victory made him the overwhelming favourite for Paris-Roubaix seven days later and the sense of inevitability is even more distinct this time around. With Tom Boonen an absentee, with perennial hopefuls Thor Hushovd and Filippo Pozzato short of form and with relatively few fresh contenders emerging, it’s hard to see how anything other than ill fortune can prevent Cancellara from winning a third Paris-Roubaix.

Indeed, for all its reputation as a lottery, Paris-Roubaix is tactically a relatively straightforward race, with Johan Vansummeren’s canny win in 2011 a rare exception to the rule that the strongest man usually prevails so long as he stays upright. Sylvain Chavanel was trying to sound an optimistic note about his chances in Roubaix when he described it as a race where “the selection occurs naturally” but inadvertently, he summed up why it will be so difficult to upset Cancellara.
Fabian Cancellara celebrates his second Tour of Flanders victory.
Photo: Photopress

Pozzato and Hushovd feeling the heat

Filippo Pozzato (Lampre-Merida) began the season with a bang thanks to victory at the Trofeo Laigueglia in February, but his classics campaign is set to end with a whimper unless he manages a dramatic turnaround at Paris-Roubaix next week. Although his fate was sealed by mechanical trouble on the Paterberg, Pozzato admitted that he was already on a bad day – “I wasn’t super,” he said – and at 31 years of age, he is fast running out of chances to add another monument to his Milan-San Remo victory of 2006, when he was trained by Dr. Michele Ferrari [Pozzato was suspended for three months last summer after admitting to their collaboration.]

Pozzato’s anonymous showing on Sunday was in the same vein as his display at Milan-San Remo two weeks ago, and he seems a shadow of the man who pushed Tom Boonen so close at the Tour of Flanders last year. If he falls short again at Roubaix, it will be third time in four years that Pozzato has made next to no impact in the spring classics.

Another man under pressure is Thor Hushovd. Signed by BMC to lead its cobbled classics squad, a virus ruined his debut campaign with the squad last year. An early win the Tour du Haut Var suggested the Norwegian had turned a corner in 2013, but he has been listless ever since. Hushovd abandoned the Tour of Flanders on Sunday, as he did at Milan-San Remo and E3 Harelbeke, and he desperately needs to show signs of life at Paris-Roubaix.
Filippo Pozzato (Lampre Merida) greets UCI president Pat McQuaid at the start in Bruges.

Women’s coverage remains a conundrum

The best rider in the world won the Tour of Flanders in front of hundreds of thousands of screaming fans on Sunday afternoon and nobody was paying attention. No, not Fabian Cancellara, but Marianne Vos. The world champion claimed an overdue victory at the women’s Tour of Flanders in Oudenaarde but her triumph was overshadowed by the men’s race which was entering its decisive phase just as Vos was taking out the sprint.

It’s a truism that the profile of women’s cycling can only be boosted by holding more events in tandem with men’s races, with the London 2012 Olympics often highlighted as exhibit A. But would that magnificent women’s road race in London have made anywhere near the same impact if it had taken place on the same day as the men’s race and without live television coverage?

Placing the women’s Tour of Flanders (and, indeed, the women’s Omloop Het Nieuwsblad and Flèche Wallonne) on the same day as the men’s events ensures enormous crowds on the roadside but – paradoxically – also limits the amount of television airtime it will receive from the outset.

Simple logistics makes providing full coverage of two simultaneous races more or less impossible and, like it or not, audience and readership demands mean that the overwhelming majority of journalists accredited for De Ronde are required to prioritise the men’s race. Switching the women’s race to the Saturday as part of a Flemish cycling weekend would reduce the crowds on the roadside but – perhaps – increase its global visibility through the media.
Marianne Vos (Rabobank Liv/Giant) celebrates victory at the Tour of Flanders after outsprinting her three breakaway companions.
Photo: AFP

Related Articles

Back to top